I used to be used to travelling by itself, so obtaining my entire spouse and children along has long been a big adjustment for me to make.
Consequently stating "I do not Believe that is usually a problem" is fine - as long as you're common with this particular use from the word "that". If not, then it could clearly bring about confusion.
Now we attempt our nifty trick of dropping on the list of "that"s — "I do not Feel that problem is major" —, and we promptly get a particular amount of people that parse the sentence as "[I don't Imagine that] [problem is severe]" on their initially test, and obtain terribly confused, and have to go back and try a different parsing. (Is that a back garden-path sentence however?)
The best way to make the font of standalone graphics with pgfplots similar to the beamertheme in use which include moloch or metropolis
Within the second sentence (my bold characters), if I chose to have a fresh vehicle is just not what is emphasized; what is emphasised may be the time and effort it took to adapt to The brand new condition, what I had to do to regulate to it.
Stack Exchange network includes 183 Q&A communities like Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for builders to know, share their knowledge, and Create their careers. Stop by Stack Exchange
The Ngram shows that in American English used not to happened less than fifty percent as regularly as failed to use(d) to in 2008, and its use has long been steadily declining.
behaves being a modal verb, so that questions and negatives are fashioned without the auxiliary verb do, as in:
Personally, more normally than not, I don't look for a double "that" being distracting or leading to confusion in any way. get more info Pretty the contrary: it is a) beautifully self-explanatory and b) it undoubtedly leads to less
Using the example sentences presented in Hellion's respond to, I feel I am able to come up with an explanation as an alternative to simply a tautology! (I had been used to accomplishing a thing. = I was accustomed to carrying out a thing.)
. The foundations of English grammar tend to be the very purpose why this sort of "strange matters" transpire in the 1st place. Now, whether or not you really wind up employing a double "that" or rewording it, can be a different question. But it is a question of fashion
In English "or" is normally taken for being exclusive or, if you want to precisely use inclusive or then use "and/or".
I'm able to sort of guess its utilization, but I need to know more relating to this grammar construction. Searching on Google mostly gave me The easy distinction between "that" and "which", and several examples using "that which":
"That bike that is blue" results in being "the bike which is blue" or simply, "the blue bike." Thus: "That that is blue" gets "that which is blue" or even "what is blue" in certain contexts.